An exclusive from Rana Dasgupta, master of tanbur-related micro-non-fiction.
—
For theartsdesk
An exclusive from Rana Dasgupta, master of tanbur-related micro-non-fiction.
—
For theartsdesk
Interview with Romesh Gunesekera, on the DSC South Asian Literary Festival/Prize.
—
For theartsdesk
Quit clanging that god-
damn bell and let me drink my
beer in peace, tourist.
Sand: A Journey Through Science And The Imagination
Michael Welland
OUP, 320pp, £18.99
ISBN 978-0-19-956318-0
‘Did you know that the Sand Mountain in Nevada emits a low C, while dunes in Chile sound an F, and those in Morocco a G#?’
Me neither. But that’s not the only thing you’ll learn about ‘the sand of music’ from Michael Welland’s genial and comprehensive monograph.
The ‘singing’ or ‘booming’ sands of the world have achieved literary immortality in the works not only of desert specialists like Thesiger and Ralph Bagnold but also of Marco Polo, Darwin, and Guy de Maupassant. These eerie sounds occur most commonly at night, but change according to season; are recorded as sounding like almost every instrument from alto sax to zither; and are ascribed variously to ‘jinns, sirens, the bells of buried churches, or the drummer of death.’
The real causes are more prosaic (though, nota bene, wind is never mentioned). On a trip to El Salvador, Darwin noted ‘the “chirping” sounds made by horses’ hooves in the sand’ – and the fact that C.9th Chinese villagers ritually worshipped their ‘Hill of Sounding Sand’ by sliding, en masse, down its slopes will have had something to do with the noises it emitted. The sheer range of naturally-occurring sounds is less quickly explained, though, and scientists have spent some considerable effort – and no doubt had a little fun – trying to recreate the full orchestra.
But there’s more to sand than scenery that provides its own soundtrack (or ‘sandtrack’, I suppose).
Welland highlights the uses of sand both in rhythm instruments and instead of them – Leroy Anderson, for example, using sandpaper to mimic the sound of Fred Astaire’s ‘sand shuffle’ – as well as in audio equipment (‘aficionados of the production of fine sound use the damping qualities of sand to stabilize speakers and other audio equipment’). Sometimes it was just a prompt for inspiration: Brian Wilson, of the Beach Boys, had his living-room grand piano installed in a sandbox (no resultant sonic effect is noted). And, very occasionally, it was even the end product: here and there you find a song with sand in its lyrics.
Coming full circle, perhaps, Welland discusses how, since the late-C.18th, sand has been used to explore the nature of sound itself, thanks to Leipzig scientist and musician Ernst Chladni, who drew his violin bow across the edge of a glass plate covered in sand (which duly formed regular patterns, rendering sound waves ‘visible’) and thereby inventing the science of acoustics. A science which, rather more recently, has enabled investigation into (inter alia) how the sand scorpion uses microscopic, low-frequency sound waves to detect the approach of potential prey and the acoustic qualities of sand to navigate towards it.
Welland acknowledges that there is still a certain level of debate on these issues and his index provides leads on several articles that could be useful, should readers feel inclined to seek out more detail. But for those with an interest in acoustic theory or music technology – not to mention undergraduates still searching for a juicier-than-average dissertation topic – Sand offers plenty of grist to the mill.
—
For Music Teacher. Not published.
You might recognise Harry Sidebottom from ‘Ancient Discoveries’ on The History Channel (presenter, not artefact); or perhaps you read Ancient Warfare: a very short introduction (OUP, 2004). But most likely you’ll have heard his name in conjunction with the bestselling Warrior of Rome, his trio (so far) of late-Classical adventures, set in the beleaguered Eastern provinces of the Roman empire and crammed to the 4- or even 500th page with cauldrons of swash, buckle, and cruel, pillaging Persians.
After top-five hits with Fire in the East (the siege of Arete, in Mesopotamia) and King of Kings (religious fanaticism and intrigue in the imperial court), last month saw the release of the trequel, Lion of the Sun, in which the emperor Valerian is betrayed while on campaign (AD 260) and the readers are reunited with the Saxon-born hero, General Ballista: cue brutal battles scenes, heroism and political skulduggery. Lion of the Sun has already sold over 14,000 copies.
Now it’s Friday afternoon – AD 2010 – and we’re sitting on the terrace at QUOD, with some fine 8% Peronis, and turning the air Imperial purple with cigarette smoke and some of the novel’s riper dialogue. Sidebottom, a jacket-and-jeans kind of guy, enjoys playing the regular bloke. Aside from being Lecturer in Ancient History at Lincoln and a Fellow of St Benet’s Hall, he lists his interests as “fiction, travel, sport, booze, and women [Erica Jong not incl.].” I also notice, retrospectively, that he’s ‘Dr. Harry Sidebottom’ on the frontispiece of his books – but not on the dust-jacket.
The Warrior of Rome novels have garnered specific plaudits for their elaborate and detailed militaria, both in intellectual and materiel terms. But apart from a stint in the CCF at school (King’s, Ely), Sidebottom is not a military man. He knew the first novel, Fire in the East, which he describes as “very army” (“I like sieges. Unity of time and place and all that”), was read in Basra – “Yeah, because a mate of mine took his free copy on deployment, and then let everyone else read it!” But on a recent pre-publication tour of the North (Leeds, not Germania) he was particularly chuffed at the number of forces personnel who came to his events and asked about his soldiering.
His own training was originally in Archaeology, at Lancaster, before he switched to Ancient History (“I didn’t want to spend my summer holiday excavating Preston”), a path of enquiry that led eventually to his DPhil at Oxford. And anything that’s not covered by that portfolio (you don’t need to have watched everything from Caligula to Generation Kill to appreciate that squaddie ‘nuance’ hasn’t developed much in 2000 years) he makes up for with voracious fiction-reading and travel. It is his avowed intent to visit every place he writes about – with the emphatic exception of bandit-ridden rural Georgia.
He is heavily influenced by Patrick O’Brian’s sea stories. And he draws structural support from Tacitus (“the best historical writer ever was basically a novelist”), whose Annals, also, were organised, thematically, in clusters of three. Sidebottom quickly rattles off all of his 12 planned titles in the series (every one of them a Ludlum-esque, Boys Own doozy), along with their basic themes. Vols. 1-3 in the Middle East; 4-6 around the Black Sea; North Africa to feature later.
“It’s a big cast, and there’s space for characters to develop, to come and go, get old and fat and disillusioned. I don’t want to give anything away; but let’s say that some of the main characters probably don’t make it to the end.” Volume 4 – The Caspian Gates – will be out next July, he says.
How did a historian of classical art and warfare come to be writing novels at all? “Well, we were drinking in the pub and my agent said, ‘Why don’t you take eight weeks off writing for [Der Germanjournalmiteinimpossiblename] and write a novel?’ So I produced a synopsis and three chapters. And I sent my agent one manuscript, and he sent it to one publisher, Penguin. There’s none of that ‘I starved in a garret’ stuff.” (He refers to a “life-changing sum of money”. Given Sidebottom’s flourishing readership and current commercial momentum, you’d have to say Penguin got that call about right.)
His editor, Alex Clarke, deals predominantly with big-selling, mass-market thrillers like Dick Francis and Clive Cussler. And while a substantive attempt is made to sustain Classical authenticity through use of Latin (and Persian) technical terms – cursory historical apparatus and vocab at the back – “it’s a matter of balance. Alex at one end saying he wants more action scenes. And I’m saying I want a 20-page exegesis on Epicurean philosophy.” (Warrior of Rome devotees might thank Clarke for that call, too.)
Sidebottom has two sons. Do they read his books? “No!” he laughs. “They’re 6 and 3!” Audio versions are available; ah, but the language… Fair’s fair: none of the books gets much beyond page 10 before the authentically un-asterisked four-letter words kick in. He received a stern letter about this, from an old lady. So what of this potential bad-language barrier? “If I’m going for maximum historical verisimilitude… Everyone’s familiar with the graffiti at Pompeii. It’s on the record that these guys swore like… well, like troopers.”
He’s having a little fun, too. One ‘Katie-girl’ is thanked (outed, perhaps) in the acknowledgments for “providing the most inventive obscenity in the book.” And there’s a Foreign Legion joke about camels that Sidebottom is trying to work into every volume in the series: “I believe Waugh pulled a similar trick with the name of some Hertford don who once pissed him off.” More cheerily, he has also used some of his pals as material: “my best mate’s nose looks like a cat’s arse. So now he thinks he’s Maximus.”
That said. “These people are not you and me in fancy dress. Their thought-world was entirely different.” Hence the introduction of the occasional Greek (i.e. literate) slave who can talk about what Socrates or Homer might have advised in similar circumstances, and the raft of major characters – Ballista, the hostage son of a German chieftain; Maximus the Hibernian – who are not actually ethnic Romans: insiders would not habitually explain (or think aloud about) the workings of their everyday environment, which could make life tricky for readers, glossary of terms or no.
Sidebottom is proud of his sales and the popularity of the whole sword-and-sandal business (“Yup, Gladiator restarted it all.”). But like the teacher he is he can’t help enthusing about the facts behind the fictions. “There’s clearly an appetite for heavily textured fiction covering everything from Zoroastrianism to Epicureanism via tables manners in Rome. It shows even the mass-market reader doesn’t just want Andy McNab in a toga.”
The non-facts, too. Censorinus, his spy chief, for instance, was real – “or a real fake, anyway”, derived from the bogus Augustan History (c.400 AD). “The author invented guys who were never emperors. Like Ballista.”
“Your Ballista? Or a different guy with the same name?”
“Or a different guy with a different name.”
“Right….”
“There are four things [included in Lion of the Sun] he may have actually done. Or not. Maybe someone else did them for him.”
The great crisis of the 3rd century is “very chaotic. Full of gaps,” a whole stretch of Roman history not even covered by the undergrad Classics syllabus. It is also Sidebottom’s academic stock-in-trade. “I was very much drawn to it because it allows a certain freedom to the novelist.” Or, as one colleague put it: “Congratulations, mate. You’ve chosen a period where no-one can prove you wrong.” (Though there was the small item of a retired Australian general who wrote to point out that eucalyptus was not, ahem, widely available in Mesopotamia at that time.)
Not that it matters. “The novels aren’t history books in disguise. I’m not writing them as an outreach programme.”
So how has Warrior of Rome been received by his academic peers?
“At the outset, the only professional historian I told was Mary Beard.” But every Classicist he’s talked to since has been very positive. “I think they realise if we don’t reach out to the broadest possible audience the subject they love will die.”
A sobering thought. And it’s getting late.
“Didn’t you have to be somewhere at 6pm sharp?” I ask.
“Nah, I just said that in case you turned out to be a complete –”
Yep. We’re out of time.
—
For The Oxford Times. Anodyne published edit here.
Understanding Music: Philosophy and Interpretation
Roger Scruton
Continuum, 244pp, £18.99
ISBN 978-1-84706-506-3
That any book might ‘appeal both to specialists of philosophy and musicology and also to the ordinary music lover’ is perhaps a little optimistic. In the case of Understanding Music, however, it is – through either authorial arrogance or editorial blindness – wildly so.
It is Scruton’s genius that he dwells in the sort of intellectual outlands where graduate-level music and the philosophy of aesthetics may meet; alas for his prospective readers, he dwells there almost entirely alone. For this ‘ordinary music lover’ at least, the Professor’s latest was nigh on unreadable. If the proof of the Understanding is in the teaching (as it should be for even the most middling academic, let alone one of Scruton’s eminence), then let me say that if I had paid for this book I would now be demanding a refund on the grounds of misrepresentation.
In attempting to reveal ‘the deeper meaning of this mysterious art’ – more or less what I was expecting, from his (ill-considered and immodest) title – Scruton divides his subject into two parts: ‘Aesthetics’, containing individual chapters on sound, movement, expression, and rhythm (with a ‘Wittgenstein on Music’ chapter dropped into the middle, seemingly at random); and ‘Criticism’, in which he ostensibly ‘applies [his] argument to modern music’ by writing about Mozart, Beethoven and Wagner (twice) before discussing, in the final three chapters, Janacek and Schoenberg, Szymanowski, and Adorno – a man hardly famous for his contributions to the musical canon.
His ‘argument’, so far as I could identify one (s.), is that tonality is not dead and never was, being inherent in music/musicality and not, contra Schoenberg, an imposed system – a point obvious to most GCSE students. Later he identifies Mozart as a genius, Beethoven as a titan of humanity, and Wagner as more readily comprehensible if you know your myths and legends – all of which ditto. His entire chapter on ‘Movement’, meanwhile, is apparently reducible to the fact that notes, not being objects, don’t actually move…
This is not, as advertised, a music book with a philosophical angle, but rather the other way around: hence Adorno. In either case, philosophy is supposed to clarify, not obscure (sure, Scruton defines a ‘secondary object’ and a ‘pure event’ – though I’m still in the dark on ‘noumenon’ and ‘Entäusserung‘ – but that’s hardly the point). Worse, and crucially, it is not a book at all, but a collection of essays, journal articles and speeches, originally written in isolation and for various publications, and now bound together without even the courtesy/pretence of some bridging material.
Anything of genuine interest gleaned from this turgid and unrewarding volume – a valuable working definition of ‘kitsch‘, for example, or remarks on the broad church of American popular music – is generally incidental, often of a purely factual nature, and always at risk of being submerged in the murk of philosophical jargon and impenetrable prose. The only brief moments of levity come when Scruton lambastes other writers for their incomprehensible, hyper-theoretical postures – and when he attempts to extend his own ‘argument’ to cover Metallica.
—
For Music Teacher. Not published.
Interview with the author of the bestselling ‘Debating Meaning as blurring boundaries kaleidoscopes birth…: codeswithing: Sinhala(s): Sri Lankan: Englishes: Music!!’ Seriously.
For theartsdesk
Then I would be:
In LRB bkshp lking @ Rob Lwl & wrried tht post-doc types cn c my Playboy pnts.
I love you.
I do.
But
when I make our sandwiches I still put slightly more cheese in mine.