Skip to content

Two plays, one critic

Review of The War Reporter and One Small Step.

Second Thoughts

Very Short Stories*
by ASH Smyth (et al.)

* inspired by the Galle Literary Festival’s Opening Lines Project

Antony Beevor
In history, as in politics, intellectual honesty is the first casualty of moral outrage. In both disciplines, the first casualty of intellectual honesty is one’s wallet.

David Blacker
‘He hit the morning, running, Benzedrine and ginger beer — more wakeup per milliliter than the most hardcore coffee — getting his tired arse out of the sack and into the trees.’ As the sun rose, the exhausted editor, eyes jacked open with several pints of the most hard-core coffee, restored the ‘e’ and ‘r’ to their rightful positions, and silently removed the superfluous comma.

Gillian Slovo
Although he had forgotten his own name, he knew a table when he saw one. Alas, he had also misplaced the word for ‘table’ – so his smugness was short-lived.

Ian Rankin
As Joe unlocked his car, he saw that there was something lying on the driver’s seat, something he definitely hadn’t left there. “I do not appreciate this,” snapped his fictional alter ego, the knife protruding from the small of his back.

Lal Medawattegedara
‘Even the clock, I sincerely suspected, was a conspirator: there was a deliberate withholding of every “tick” that denoted a second, and the resulting tension reminded me of my brother on his death bed minutes before his life ebbed away.’ I put down my pen and glanced across to check that he was still breathing.

Louise Doughty
My father’s funeral took place in great secrecy – he was buried under the cover of darkness and the only attendees, apart from myself, were the cleaner who had looked after him in his last days and a man from the Ministry who identified himself only as ‘a very old friend’. “Best not tell anyone about this”, he said.

Michelle de Kretser
She said they had a choice. She lied.

Rana Dasgupta
When you broke it down, he thought, life was mainly about moving things from one place to another. (The removals business was slow this time of year, and Barry had plenty of time for thinking.)

Ru Freeman
Everything had changed and nothing had changed. Her debut novel was out; but still, now, again, the blank page.

Shehan Karunatilaka
He woke up in a pile of vomit. A preliminary taste-test confirmed that it was not, alas, his own.

Shyam Selvadurai
In her letters, my grandmother had told me about the renovations to Chandra’s home, but I was still amazed when I saw it. The JCB sat, triumphant, on half an acre of scorched earth.

Wendy Cope
When you step outside, perhaps you’ll see
an envoy from the Nobel Literature Committee;
though it’s unlikely.

Any ‘umbrella of tranquillity’ in a storm

In the first of the Great Artist Series, presented by the Chamber Music Society of Colombo, acclaimed French pianist Jean-Bernard Pommier performed three meisterwerk sonatas to a sell-out Goethe-Institut crowd.

Mozart’s Sonata in D Major is a lightish confection, perhaps slightly more icing than cake, from an era when pianos were still quite piano and you didn’t need a 15” hand-span to play the big numbers. The piece, written in the composer’s relative maturity, is also, in itself, quite scaled back, and Pommier played it, such as is possible, according to the manner of the day (i.e. feet nowhere near the pedals).

It was a consummate rendition, neither metronomic (contra my boyhood piano teacher) nor excessively flamboyant, and as a thunderstorm opened up outside the alternate turns of vibrancy and quietude preserved us under the umbrella of tranquillity.

Not so with the ‘Appassionata’ (Sonata no. 23 in F minor). Even Beethoven reckoned this monumental and heroic piece to be one of his best works – and it is PDG. From the noble, march-like principal tune to the pounding of the keys (NB appassionata not to be attempted on first dates) and the trilling in the ivory stratosphere, Beethoven gave his full, brawling, elemental mad-browed might to the storm now raging outside. As the thunderclaps landed bang on the chords, it ceased to be clear who was providing whom with the ‘rolling accompaniment’. In Pommier’s fade-to-pianissimo ‘Allegro assai’ I scribbled: ‘the two avenging soldiers fall together in the rainstorm, lie on their backs looking up at the clearing skies, and, finally, rest in peace.’

That said – and perhaps it was the hour-glass shape of the venue, or just where I was sitting – what I had taken as the pianist’s exemplary restraint in the Mozart now seemed just a touch too cool. By the end of the ‘allegro ma non troppo’ Pommier could (should?) have been hitting the piano with a sledgehammer – but wasn’t. No matter: the piece still rightly got a standing ovation.

It is hard to believe that Liszt’s Sonata in B minor is separated from the ‘Appassionata’ by only fifty years. But both indicative and evocative of the particular brand of untrammelled Romantic genius that Liszt typified, the pedal (the important one) was down and everything was going full whack (everything except the nicely atmospheric storm, of course, which had passed without so much as a by-your-leave).

Huge – almost symphonic – in scope, and incorporating, in its massive single movement, touches of Puccini, Wagner, Mendelssohn, even Gershwin, the virtuosic B minor seems to condense not only the whole orchestra into two hands, but the whole of C.19th musical history – half of which hadn’t even happened yet.

Needless to say, this is a ridiculously difficult piece, even by the standards of the international star circuit. Simply daring to play it is half the show (just reading the sheet music is a challenge beyond all but the most battle-hardened pianists), and it was amazing to see it done with such gliding dexterity – not least from a man with the physique of a Welsh baritone/shot-putter.

There’s something slightly frantic and Tom-and-Jerryish about Liszt’s virtuosity, though. Jerry hits Tom with frying pan (crash), Tom sees stars (twinkle twinkle), Tom trudges home, tail dragging on the ground (minor slow bit), Tom plots revenge (low growls), Tom sets trap (short mischievous bursts), Jerry comes sauntering along (ominous crescendo), then start again in the next episode.

To accuse Liszt of pure stunt-making would be harsh; but there are moments when extreme showmanship can make a piece seem… less profound… than perhaps it actually is. It’s like, say, Thomas Pynchon novels: colossal, not frankly 100% convincing, and more beloved of the critics than of the broader literate populace (who prefer Dickens). The B minor is, undeniably, a showstopper. But personally I’d have closed with the more satisfying Beethoven.

Pommier, inevitably, wasn’t let off before the audience had extorted two encores: a trifling little central-European dance number that he played with almost dismissive effortlessness; then a shameless and totally brilliant rendition of Chopin’s Minute Waltz, so fast it ought to have been renamed. Genuinely impossible, without sight of the keyboard, to ‘see’ how this could be played by human hands.

Jean-Bernard Pommier and CMSC chief Lakshman Joseph de Saram are discussing launching an appeal for a concert grand, in readiness for the opening of the new National Performing Arts Theatre. This is a tremendous idea that deserves support (please direct cash donations to me c/o The Sunday Times – in unmarked, non-sequential bills – and I’ll see that it gets to the right place).

Nor – I hasten to add – was it ill grace that prompted Pommier to comment, gently, on the Goethe’s piano. It’s not concert standard, is all (basically, there are a couple of strings missing, but it’s also not sufficiently tuned), and in a national capital, with visiting musicians of Pommier’s calibre, that’s a poor show.

Published version – incl. minor abridgements – here.

Paths less travelled by

(Unexpurgated) review of the Chamber Music Society of Colombo’s Troubled Seas and Forest Paths concert

I appreciate it must be tiresome – not to say slightly unnerving – listening to middle-aged boffins frotting over high-grade music, and that it’s not much better when the middle-aged boffins are actually in their 20s. But what to do? That’s the job.

The CMSC’s recording-quality performance of Mozart’s Il Re Pastore overture had me salivating and (I checked) my heart actually racing. This is what CMSC does best – pieces that are logistically small-scale, but technically and emotionally demanding – and what puts them in a league of their own is a simple matter of unity. Cohesion. Plenty of spirit, too, of course; but mere élan is worthless without discipline – as faithful followers of French rugby will attest.

Can’t say I warmed to the Hindemith, though (cue jokes about what happens if you let a viola-player run the show). Some of the Acht Stücke had more zip than others, but, matters of non-resolution and atonality having moved on in the intervening 80 years, this once-radical stuff now seems just a bit passé and wilful: like looking at photos of your old haircuts. An unrelaxing 20 minutes for the musicians, the eight pieces were nonetheless tidily rendered – this being very much an instance of Ben Franklin’s ‘hang together or hang separately’ dictum – even if the confidence of the delivery was generally in inverse proportion to the number of players involved. Serious kudos, though, for a serious tackling of a serious work.

If Hindemith stück it too us rather less than one might have feared, Vivaldi’s Concerto Grosso in D min opened on a far more aggressive note (a D) than one would ever have expected. Weary and unimaginative reviewers like to remind folks that ‘baroque’ actually means ‘misshapen’, and this piece – one of 12 ‘harmonic inspirations’ – recalled a bold and adventurous phase in the wild Western musical tradition. Scored for two violins and a cellist, plus continuo, the concerto strained to heights of tension and suspense that are totally beyond metaphor; cellist Dushy Perera played phenomenally in ‘Allegro’; and such was the soloists’ attack and vigour that their deputies fled their desks.

CMSC’s composer-in-residence, Stephen Allen, was also conductor-insitu for the Colombo premiere of his Forest Paths song cycle. Musically, the work sits somewhere between John Adams’ harmonic-rhythmic motivation and the intense lyricism of Benjamin Britten (who produced his own good stuff about turbulent seas). Kind of a soundtrack for a wistful-Canadian-poet film that will never get funding.

The text for the soaringly operatic vocal part was Allen’s own, ‘loosely depicting the moods and changes within a forest’. Loosely, alas, was about right. From Mary Anne David’s fragile delivery I identified ‘glorious day’ and ‘sunshine’, ‘I love you’ and ‘little else’. In short, we couldn’t hear the words for the trees.

There is nothing wrong with David’s pitch, and she has a wonderful sustain; but her tone is old and clouded. Unfortunately many of the most beautiful moments in the suite – incl. some elegiac Ethel-Smyth-style string melodies (no relation) – occurred while David was not singing. The ecstatic garlanding that followed was just plain embarrassing.

If the interval was designed to pour oil on troubled waters, Handel’s ‘Overture’ to Alessandro tossed a match onto the resulting millpond. It’s not GF’s greatest work, it must be said, but it was worth it just to watch Othman Hassan Majid at second violin. The man’s action is so smooth you’d think he was miming: the sound seems to just emanate from somewhere nearby.

Haydn’s Symphony No. 39 in G min (‘Il Mare Turbito’ – you sea?) started superbly, but flagged in the slow middle sections. The second movement was particularly untidy, and the violas conspicuously fluffed their few opportunities to shine (every joke about violas is true, by the way). I’m not saying the CMSC were complacent, but they are adrenaline junkies, and they need to regulate the IV.

For whatever reasons, though – a feisty ‘Allegro di molto’; a phone ringing in the audience – the team rediscovered their mojo in the closing movement, which was of truly professional standard. Righteous applause, and even a few whistles. The Symphony Orchestra doesn’t get whistles. Not on the good days, anyway.

Two footnotes, which I am inclined to start appending to every review:

1) There is a clear rule that you don’t clap between movements unless the performance has been so spectacular your hands take matters into their own: it distracts the musicians and breaks the mood. This rule stands even when your favourite Aunty is singing solo.

2) When you’re asked to turn off your phone, it’s not a polite request from some over-sensitive-musician types. It’s part of the contract of your attendance. If you’re expecting a call, stay home.

Expurgated version here.

Sarnath Banerjee has his own aesthetics

only they’re a bit… wonky.

Interview and slide-show with Delhi’s finest graphic novelist.


For theartsdesk

“Obvious pitfalls were not routinely blundered into.”

Glowing review of the SOSL Guest Conductor concert, 2010.

[In which we learn, also, that it is better to file one’s copy at the absolute last minute, thereby precluding the editor from tampering with the text.]

Beer, Roving, and getting to write your own headlines

Letter from the Galle Literary Festival 2011.


For theartsdesk

“What’s so wrong with having a sense of humour?”

ASH Smyth meets his poetic heroin(e) and suffers a Dictaphone malfunction

 

When you step outside, perhaps you’ll see
an envoy from the Nobel Literature Committee;
though it’s unlikely.

This was my attempt at ‘finishing’ Wendy Cope’s contribution to the GLF’s Opening Lines Project. I figured it did the job, a fragment of Cope-style (Copious?) irreverence (Co-impious?) within a loosely poetic form. It was only afterwards – after the whole festival was concluded, in fact – that I realised I had also inadvertently taken on one of the poet’s key themes: the odds against a humorous writer being garlanded with literary laurels. To wit…  

Over a cup of Sunday-morning coffee at the Galle Fort Hotel, I try very hard not to spoil Cope’s weekend by asking, in so many words, why she is not taken seriously.

I genuinely don’t get it. Flick through any of her books and amongst the Wordsworthian spoofs of ‘Baa Baa Black Sheep’ and the four-liners about drunk husbands (great stuff for poetry readings, not to mention exceptionally neat) there are existential notes on one’s reflection; considerations of the dwindling, or not, of long-term relationships; poems on politics and disenchantment. All highly readable; all perfectly serious. There is a 20-page narrative on the life of a schoolboy who turned to shoplifting. The eponymous poem of her third book, If I Don’t Know, is a sincere meditation, addressed to a female friend, on the beauty of her garden on a summer evening (contra weary poetic tradition this is not some randy bucolic euphemism: Wendy’s not that kind of lady, and I’ll call out anyone who says otherwise).

Cope even takes humour seriously – if only as a joke. Consider ‘A Poem on the Theme of Humour’, a letter (actually sent? I’d assume so) to the organisers of the Bard of the Year poetry competition, saying how right they are to outlaw ‘humour’ as a category.

And then, of course, there’s ‘Haiku: On Looking Out of the Back Bedroom Window without My Glasses’. OK, so that one’s not particularly earnest; but it’s right there opposite ‘If I Don’t Know’.

Cope is also a genius with forms (again, even if/when she is ‘only’ taking the mick – do you know a villanelle when you see one?). Extensive Amazon research reveals that she features on someone’s list of ‘The very best modern formal poets’ as well as on ‘Things that Jenny likes to be distracted by’ (the latter hosted by one ‘Madame Jenny’). Cope, I suspect, would be tickled by the incongruity.

Clive James, another formal virtuoso, once defined humour as “common sense dancing.” So whence this absurd assumption that humour automatically denotes frivolity? (I mean, ask any comedian. Or anyone Jewish.) Alas, in the prevailing literary environment, where you have to be grim to be considered important (just because it works for Coetzee…), humour is a two-edged sword.*

But if those are the terms, it almost seems that Cope doesn’t want to be taken seriously. Not too seriously, anyway. She slays her detractors with unblinking irony – “There are some drawbacks to being regarded as a humorous poet. You sell lots of books and that’s thought of as cheating.” – and all without sarcasm or scorn, which is why the crowds love her.

Given her back catalogue, Cope can afford the poker-face approach. She is holding the poetry industry’s equivalent of a full house, where most of her competitors can barely summon a single ace.

Her first book, Making Cocoa for Kingsley Amis, made her an overnight star, selling, to date, around 200,000 copies. Serious Concerns – note the rather pointed title – has sold even better, though it’s still catching up in real terms. If I Don’t Know is hot on their heels. Then there’s her latest, Two Cures for Love: selected poems 1979-2006. (It is a testament to Cope’s integrity that, although Two Cures also includes new material, she is uncomfortable about its being considered a book in its own right – rightly – and put her foot down when the publisher wanted to subtitle it ‘new and selected…’)

Cope’s edited collections – Is That The New Moon? (an anthology of women poets), The Funny Side and Heaven on Earth: 101 Happy Poems – sell merely in the tens of thousands; some tens of thousands more than the average poetry publication. Then there’s George Herbert: verse and prose, a selection from the work of the C.17th spiritual writer and orator. Y’know – because she’s a serious poet.

Her own poems are anthologised, in their turn, all over the English-speaking world. She’s won awards. She’s had a poem set to music by the rhythm-and-blues artist Jools Holland, from which she makes nice royalties, she says. And now, thanks to the tireless efforts of a certain young lit. journalist, ‘Wendy Cope’ is even her own category on the influential Prospect blog.

She talks of the economics of popularity, and how making it big after Making Cocoa meant accepting certain adjustments in life: “I had to learn not to give out my phone number, things like that.” She got better at saying no to things, like commissions (“‘Can you do a poem on the rugby World Cup by 4:30 this afternoon?’ ‘Well , no.’”). Or not saying no, and damning the consequences. She once wrote a poem for the WWF – Wildlife Fund, not Wrestling Federation – with the punch-line “the lamb is not endangered.” To which the response was “Obviously we can’t publish this.”

She disparages the poets’ cliché that “happiness writes white” (i.e. produces nothing of any visible merit), but says she actually quite welcomes the occasional stimulus of commissions now that she’s relatively content and has less, correspondingly, to write about. Also, she has the money these days not to need to accept them. She long-since retired (early) as a primary school teacher, and has recently started receiving her state pension. Poetry is still no goldmine, though, and she laments the fact that while this recent bonus helps with running costs – jetting to tropical islands for literary festivals, and the like – her partner, notwithstanding his own list of publications, is still not at liberty to accompany her. He works, suffice to say, as a teacher. (Now I’m wondering if he teaches her poems…).

There’s one last question, a question I’ve been burning to ask since, aged about 17, I was first introduced to Wendy Cope’s poems. Making Cocoa for Kingsley Amis – the debut title, per se, that made her name – was there ever any chance of the book being called something else?

Well, yes, she says, undoubtedly – though the alternative titles do not immediately spring to re-mind. But Craig Raine (noted poet and Poetry Editor at Faber) identified ‘Making Cocoa’ instantly. “I said perhaps we ought to ask Kingsley Amis if he objected,” and the media savvy Raine pointed out that there could be tremendous publicity if they didn’t, “but I felt it was polite.” Once they’d assured Amis that he wasn’t being made fun of – courtesy of Raine’s friend and Kingsley’s son, Martin – he was perfectly happy: “in fact he said some very nice things about it.”

Which flawless segue brings us to the high point of my own personal GLF: “In that case, might I give you… this?”

Snorting Coke Off Martin Amis
(tribute to Wendy Cope)

This came to me while sitting
on the loo.

I reckoned Cope would like it.
(Amis too.)

Tense moment. Then she laughs, and asks if she should autograph it – “This made me laugh.” I try not to giggle. “Of course,” she says, “Martin Amis might not find it so funny…”

‘Amis fils Flies to Tropics to Punch Journalist in Face!’? Well, anything’s worth a shot. As Cope heads down to the pool, I pick up my Dictaphone and realise that not a single word of proceedings has been recorded. Never mind. Something tells me I’ll remember this one.


* NB it ought still, actually, to have edges.

Version, just about, of piece here.

Heil, Mary…

Review of voice-and-piano, at the Goethe-Insitut.

The Canterbury Tale-teller

Interview (and beers) with Rana Dasgupta, enfant génial of Indian letters.